In 2006, an average of 530 unborn babies were killed in the UK, every day. I blogged it here.
Today, I read an article at the Daily Mail online, about how 1,000 unborn babies die unnecessarily each year due to a shortage of midwives. You can see the full story here.
Each story is an absolute tragedy. The preventable, needless loss of life in both situations is very upsetting.
The difference in the two articles is in one, the unborn baby will be called anything but, to allow society to accept the senseless slaughter of innocent life. Whilst in the other, all of a sudden it *is* an unborn baby, to allow the article to carry emotional weight and a political slant.
After all, what person wouldn't be upset at the needless loss of unborn babies?
No comments:
Post a Comment